Talk:Main Page: Difference between revisions

:This seems a really worthwhile initiative. Regarding the section for Voice related paper, maybe you already have thoughts on this, but I think it would be useful to recommend the kinds of detail desired (Title, Authors, DOI, source link(s), adding categories). Open links (eg Arxiv) would be preferred over those to non-free / subscription sites. Might also want to mention any preferences around pre-review/early access papers and handling updated versions and broken links. [[User:Nmstoker|Nmstoker]] ([[User talk:Nmstoker|talk]]) 14:06, 12 November 2021 (CET)

:Another general thought: where do you stand on inclusion of opinion/original information in the wiki? Wikipedia is firmly about referencing information from sources, so they avoid hosting original information and only include things that are backed by references. I'm guessing that there may be grounds for more flexibility here, but deciding where to draw the line is worth considering. In a similar way, deciding where the line is between sharing knowledge vs excess promotion might need judgement. The key open source players do not strike me as being likely to over promote but there could be firms that aren't so reasonable, so having some kind of policy on this might help. [[User:Nmstoker|Nmstoker]] ([[User talk:Nmstoker|talk]]) 14:15, 12 November 2021 (CET)

::Copy'n Paste information from internetpages is not what i would prefer. Linking to sources seems is better. I'd hope that we can create a central knowledgebase for all open voice related projects and for that we have to add relevant information here. Over time we could vote some active users for being Admins here and help to control excessive promotion. --[[User:Thorsten|Thorsten]] ([[User talk:Thorsten|talk]]) 20:23, 12 November 2021 (CET)