Voice Technology Wiki talk:About: Difference between revisions
(about contributes on the wiki) |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== about contributes on the wiki == | |||
Hi Thorsten! | Hi Thorsten! | ||
| Line 9: | Line 11: | ||
Thanks again | Thanks again | ||
respect | respect | ||
giorgio | |||
giorgio --[[User:Solyarisoftware|Solyarisoftware]] ([[User talk:Solyarisoftware|talk]]) 09:28, 10 December 2021 (CET) | |||
: Good point. I've created a special page for that. Maybe we can discuss there [[OVT:What is OpenVoice-Tech Wiki|What is OpenVoice-Tech Wiki]].--[[User:Thorsten|Thorsten]] ([[User talk:Thorsten|talk]]) 13:00, 10 December 2021 (CET) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:00, 10 December 2021
about contributes on the wiki[edit source]
Hi Thorsten!
Thanks for your initiative here and your work on Open German Voice Dataset (even if I don't know German language(ù)! I'll try to contribute the wiki and for sure I'll share on twitter and linkedin.
My personal main concern, when by example writing on this wiki a definition of a concept, or a company/project, is that I'm naturally biased/opinionated on a technology or any tech solution. Also any definition I could add is for sure debatable. Even if I'm aware about the wiki/wikipedia-like common way to evolve/refine contents (with the continuous-delivery :) contribute of many people during time), my question is:
In general, it's ok if I submit a definition that inevitably contains a personal bias/comment ?
Thanks again
respect
giorgio --Solyarisoftware (talk) 09:28, 10 December 2021 (CET)
- Good point. I've created a special page for that. Maybe we can discuss there What is OpenVoice-Tech Wiki.--Thorsten (talk) 13:00, 10 December 2021 (CET)