Talk:OVT:What is OpenVoice-Tech Wiki: Difference between revisions
(re) |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
--[[User:Solyarisoftware|Solyarisoftware]] ([[User talk:Solyarisoftware|talk]]) 13:34, 10 December 2021 (CET) | --[[User:Solyarisoftware|Solyarisoftware]] ([[User talk:Solyarisoftware|talk]]) 13:34, 10 December 2021 (CET) | ||
: In case it's obvious wrong then it can be corrected, but if it's general disagreement it should be discussed before edited. Do you have additional ideas for "contribution guidelines"?--[[User:Thorsten|Thorsten]] ([[User talk:Thorsten|talk]]) 18:20, 10 December 2021 (CET) | : In case it's obvious wrong then it can be corrected, but if it's general disagreement it should be discussed before edited. Do you have additional ideas for "contribution guidelines"?--[[User:Thorsten|Thorsten]] ([[User talk:Thorsten|talk]]) 18:20, 10 December 2021 (CET) | ||
It's clear and I agree. Maybe the entire process (discussion on disagreement/major correction) could be pointed out / put in evidence in the main page / guidelines page, because for me, at first glance wasn't so clear.--[[User:Solyarisoftware|Solyarisoftware]] ([[User talk:Solyarisoftware|talk]]) 10:25, 12 December 2021 (CET) |
Revision as of 10:25, 12 December 2021
Our principles
Thanks Solyarisoftware for bringing this topic up. I've created this page as a collection for principals of OpenVoice-Tech Wiki. Maybe we can discuss and develop our principals here. --Thorsten (talk) 12:59, 10 December 2021 (CET)
about contributes on the wiki
Hi Thorsten, a minor duplication of the same subject here: https://openvoice-tech.net/index.php?title=OpenVoice-Tech_Wiki_talk:About
Following your right suggestions, I guess the fair process is: If you disagree with a written content do not simply change it, but use "Discussion" page to discuss with original writer
thanks --Solyarisoftware (talk) 13:34, 10 December 2021 (CET)
- In case it's obvious wrong then it can be corrected, but if it's general disagreement it should be discussed before edited. Do you have additional ideas for "contribution guidelines"?--Thorsten (talk) 18:20, 10 December 2021 (CET)
It's clear and I agree. Maybe the entire process (discussion on disagreement/major correction) could be pointed out / put in evidence in the main page / guidelines page, because for me, at first glance wasn't so clear.--Solyarisoftware (talk) 10:25, 12 December 2021 (CET)